|
Cops are the city's equivalent of Wal Mart security guards. They are glorified armed thugs paid by the Mayor to serve his will, not yours.  They only seem more legitimate than a Wal Mart guard because you have been conditioned to think they are more offical and somehow have more authority.  You have also been conditioned to believe they serve you.  That's also a load of hogwash.  You are far more likely to be harassed by the cops than to be protected from assault, robbery, rape, or murder.  In case after case, the supreme court has confirmed that the police have no obligation to protect you.  If they did, whenever you were victimized by crime, you could sue them for failure to perform on their obligation.
My Five Police Reforms: |
1)
Armed cops are at least as dangerous to the community as any other bozo with an average IQ of 105 and a gun.  More so, in fact, since they think they have a right to draw their hand cannons against people in cases other than self-defense.  When the law is wrong, such as "Thou shalt not possess a taboo plant leaf," the cop is wrong to enforce it.  In such a case, resisting arrest would be self-defense, and the arrest itself is the assault.  The victim would be morally justified to defend himself from the assailant in that case.  Cops should only use a gun in cases where the rest of us also have a right to use one.
In case you're worried that the cops would be defenseless, don't be.  The smart ones (the ones who should have guns) will arm themselves despite the law, just as any other intelligent human being would if he thought it necessary for self-defense.  The dumb ones will obey the law, and be weeded out of the gene pool by normal evolutionary forces.
Armed cops are at high risk of being killed with their own guns: "25% of officers killed are killed with their own weapon."  Taking their guns away would help save their lives.
3)   Apply Higher Penalties For Police Wrongdoing
4)   Impose Annual Community Review
5)   Fund Cops with Contributions
--  JackneySneeb <---click to email your reply