|
Dear Subscriber,
This message needs a very prominent disclaimer. This is because the federal
control freaks and their hired thugs, who don't hesitate to resort to overt
oppression and violence themselves, are scared to death that one day their
victims will decide to do a little "enforcement" of their own. You see,
"government" folk can kick down doors, taser people, drag people away, shoot
people, imprison people, steal property, and otherwise harass and intimidate
the
peasantry as often as they like, but if you happen to make some comment
about the purpose of the Second Amendment, well then, you're a TERRORIST!
(The feds accusing someone of being a "terrorist" is a little like Hitler
calling someone an anti-semite.) So I want to make this perfectly clear, so
that even a hired federal goon or a judge can understand it: I am NOT
advocating the following scenario. Far from it. I am pointing out how
irrational and thug-minded the feds' method of "debate" is, by seeing what
their rationale would look like in the other direction. So, with that being
said, imagine the following story appearing in "Domestic Terrorist Weekly":
---------------------------------------
TAX EXTREMIST APPREHENDED
April 15, 2010
(c)2010 Associated Militant Press - Washington, DC
This week the Militia Department of Justice announced the arrest of another
in a long line of "freedom protestors" who have been thumbing their noses at
the American public, duping people into handing over money they didn't owe.
"This should send a strong message to any other freedom protestors that
their lawlessness will not be tolerated," said Militia Attorney General
Trooth D. Fender, after the arrest of so-called "district judge" Powe R.
Happee, adding that "These scam artists are duping the public and defrauding
innocent people, and must be held accountable."
Last month Common Law Court Justice B. Dunn issued an injunction, barring an
extremist cult publication called "The New York Times" from printing any
more tax-related articles. "This abusive extortion scheme is an affront to
all law-abiding citizens," said Judge Dunn in his ruling, before imposing a
ten-year prison sentence on David Cay Johnston, the leader and head guru of
the "freedom deniers" sect at the "New York Times" cult.
"If you tell Americans that they owe the tax, you can expect to be forcibly
silenced," said tax expert Ikan Reed. "Even the few judges and IRS agents
who have been found not guilty of fraud have had all their money stolen and
their houses burned to the ground, as a warning to others who might be
considering taking their advice." Mr. Reed also added, "I mean, if we all
owe the tax like they
claim, why do these guys keep getting captured and locked up?"
Commissioner of Liberty, Propper T. Wrights, said that he is asking the
Militia Congress for more powers to fight against the freedom protestors,
including the ability to impose more severe fines and penalties against the
promoters of the "61 fraud scheme"--a frivolous argument in which proponents
claim that Section 61 of the Internal Revenue Code means that all income is
taxable for all Americans. "These frivolous scams must be stopped at all
costs, to protect the innocent," said Mr. Wrights.
- --------------------------------------
Aside from a little pointless "turnabout-is-fair-play" daydreaming, what's
the point here? It is this:
Would kidnapping a few dozen IRS bureaucrats prove that we don't owe the
tax? No. Would hanging a judge or two prove us right? No. Would forcibly
silencing opposing views show the validity of our position? No. What proves
someone right is EVIDENCE and LOGIC. Any bozo should be able to understand
that.
So why is it that the government, and its lapdog media, constantly harp on
how much the feds have HURT people who say "861"? (And they're hoping to do
the same to Wesley Snipes.) What kind of moron thinks that THAT is proof
that the 861 evidence is invalid? "Hey, we locked some people up, stole lots
of money and property, and silenced a bunch of web sites. See? We told you
they were wrong!" Nice mentality.
Luckily, most of us outgrew this outlook on life at about age three, when we
realized that smacking our sibling in the head didn't actually prove that we
were in the right. Trouble is, neither federal judges nor IRS and DOJ thugs
have figured that out yet. They still think locking people up, issuing
injunctions and swiping property is an adequate substitute for rational
discussion. Or rather, they think it's okay for THEM to use violence instead
of words; but if they even suspect for a second that WE might resort to
violence, they run crying to the nearest armed federal thug. What a bunch of
hypocritical, spineless cowards.
Sincerely,
--Larken Rose
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe, send a blank message to
tmds-on@mail-list.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank message to
tmds-off@mail-list.com
|